Published November/December 2013
A look at how operating partnership units changed (and continue to shape) REITs and real estate investment.
Looking back at the history of the REIT industry, the year 1993 stands out as a key turning point.
A total of nine equity REITs had held initial public offerings (IPOs) in the United States in 1991 and 1992, the beginning stages of the Modern REIT Era. Yet, in 1993 alone, 44 equity REITs went public.
What changed in that one particular year? Operating partnership units (OPUs) and the expansion of the UPREIT structure came into vogue.
“In many ways the UPREIT set the stage for everything that is the REIT industry today,” says Bernard Winograd, a retired REIT executive and investor who played an instrumental role in the development of the UPREIT.
“I think the UPREIT was instrumental in turbocharging the whole industry and its ability to equitize accordingly,” says Sam Zell, chairman of Equity Group Investments.
What are REIT OP units?
“The genius of operating partnership units was to marry rigorous tax planning with sophisticated equity capital markets thinking,” says Ettore Santucci, a partner with Goodwin Procter who chairs the law firm’s capital markets practice and serves as co-chair of its REIT practice.
In the typical UPREIT, the partners of the existing partnerships and a newly formed REIT become partners in a new partnership termed the operating partnership. For their respective interests in the operating partnership, the partners contribute the properties from the existing partnership and the REIT contributes the cash proceeds from its public offering. The REIT typically acts as the general partner and the majority owner of the operating partnership units.
“From a tax perspective, OPUs are partnership interests in a controlled limited partnership or LLC subsidiary of the REIT that, when exchanged for interests in a closely held partnership, allow for the contribution of real estate from private ownership to eventual public ownership while deferring the recognition of tax gain,” Santucci explains.
After a period of time, often one year, the partners can tender their OPUs for either cash or REIT shares at the option of the REIT or operating partnership. The conversion may result in the partners incurring the tax deferred at the UPREIT’s formation. The holders of OPUs may tender them over a period of time, spreading out the tax liability.
“From an equity capital markets perspective, OPUs are effectively non-voting equity securities of the REIT,” Santucci says. “They have the same value and access to liquidity as the REIT’s stock listed on the NYSE because of the holder’s right to have each OPU redeemed in cash for the value of a share of REIT common stock, and the REIT has the option to exchange OPUs in kind for shares of REIT common stock on a one-for-one basis in lieu of cash redemption.”
Taubman Breaks the Mold
The UPREIT structure is an invention born of necessity. In the wake of the savings and loan crisis of the late 1980s, the capital markets dried up for the commercial real estate industry. The banks, thrifts and insurance companies that had financed the industry up to that point were no longer willing to lend to commercial real estate companies.
“I was told by one banker that if you brought in cash as collateral equal to the amount you wanted to borrow, you still couldn’t get a loan,” recalls Winograd, who served as chief financial officer of Taubman Centers (NYSE: TCO) in the 1990s. “The scrutiny on real estate exposure was that strong.”
That left companies like Taubman Centers, which needed fresh capital to expand two of its mall properties, in a tight spot. As David Simon, chairman and CEO of mall REIT Simon Property Group (NYSE: SPG), notes, accessing the public equity markets wasn’t thought to be an option at that point. “Because many of the best real estate companies were made up of partnerships, there was really no way to go ahead and take them public without paying a significant tax bill, even though they weren’t selling their economic interests,” he says.
—Ettore Santucci, Partner, Goodwin Procter
With Taubman Centers looking for a capital infusion, it turned to one of its most reliable sponsors, the General Motors pension fund. After talks between the two stalled, investment bank Morgan Stanley approached Taubman Centers management with a bold idea about taking the firm public.
In essence, the UPREIT structure was created in 1992 as a result of those talks. With the blessing of a tax opinion from the law firm Goodwin Procter, it was determined that private owners and limited partnerships could contribute real estate assets to a partnership operated by a REIT in exchange for units of that operating partnership without triggering an immediate tax liability. That opinion enabled the use of UPREITs in a public securities offering.
“We had the largest single legal bill that I’ve ever seen for a transaction,” Winograd says.
Representatives from Taubman then went on the road to promote what Winograd calls the “IPO from hell.” Not only were they trying to sell investors on the merits of their business, they had to explain a unique corporate structure that was the first of its kind.
After two years of trying to put a deal together, Taubman Centers held an IPO in December 1992, raising nearly $300 million.
“The work done in that deal proved to be a turning point in the ‘modern REIT era,’ with the UPREIT structure paving the way for the IPOs of numerous widely respected private real estate operating companies,” Santucci says. “Without OPUs, it would simply not have been feasible for those private companies to migrate to publicly traded status, because the tax liabilities involved would have been staggering and the public equity capital markets would never have allowed pre-IPO owners to pull out sufficient cash to fund their tax obligations. Tax deferral was not only important, it was necessary for asset portfolios to move to listed REITs.”
Start of a Trend
As word of Taubman Centers’ intention to go public began to circulate in the real estate community, Winograd says the firm’s gambit raised the interests of other cash-strapped firms. “Obviously there was intense interest in the details,” he says.
—David Simon, Chariman & CEO, Simon Property Group
Why? According to Jay Flaherty, former chairman and CEO of HCP, Inc. (NYSE: HCP), pulling off an IPO represented a matter of survival for plenty of real estate players at that point.
“If you go back to the early ‘90s, there were a whole bunch of really prominent real estate folks who were over-levered,” he says. “They were dangling on the cliff. Operating partnership units provided a mechanism for liquidity.”
Once the Taubman Centers deal was completed, a host of companies followed suit. “Within two or three years, almost the entire real estate industry got equitized,” says Zell, whose apartment REIT, Equity Residential (NYSE: EQR), held an IPO in 1993. Other companies that went public in the immediate aftermath of the Taubman Centers IPO include Camden Property Trust (NYSE: CPT), Simon Property Group, Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. (NYSE: SKT) and Vornado Realty Trust (NYSE: VNO).
OPUs and the UPREIT served companies’ immediate need for equity capital at the time, but benefits in the longer term have been even greater, according to observers. OPUs gave real estate owners a flexible conduit for generating liquidity. As a result, REITs have used OPUs to finance high-profile deals, such as Boston Properties’ (NYSE: BXP) acquisitions of the Prudential Center in Boston and Embarcadero Center in San Francisco.
“To me, one of the real drawbacks of the real estate industry was that it was very hard to grow by acquisitions,” Winograd says. “You had to use cash or debt to buy things. One of the principal concerns that I had in mind was that when this is over, we want a vehicle where we can buy someone’s real estate from them and use equity. We got that.”
REITs continue to use OPUs today to facilitate deals, and they’re seeing a renaissance in many sectors.
“OP Units were a critical element in the Aimco (NYSE: AIM) IPO almost 20 years ago,” says Aimco Chairman and CEO Terry Considine. “OP Units remain an excellent way for sellers of real estate to combine real estate returns with public market liquidity. For REITs, OP units are one more tool to fund growth.”
Ultimately, though, the biggest winners from the creation of OPUs have been investors, according to Simon.
“It allowed companies like ours to grow through issuing common stock or their equivalents in the form of operating partnership units,” he says. “It gave investors exposure to high-quality management and high-quality portfolios.”
Allen Kenney is REIT magazine’s editorial director.